The framework for a compliant and successful video telematics implementation To ensure compliance with each country’s data protection and privacy laws, fleets will need a robust data security architecture that can be customised for the requirements of different countries and work councils, while also ensuring broad compliance with EU-level requirements. A one-size-fits-all approach to video telematics will place fleets at risk of unnecessary exposure. As well as ensuring open communication with work councils and unions based on the principles outlined above, a successful framework employs a phased approach that centres on building driver trust and union collaboration. Phase 1: Road-facing camera system By starting dash camera implementation with units that feature only a road-facing lens, drivers can see how the camera protects their welfare by acting as an independent witness in the event of unforeseen circumstances. With continued evidence throughout the fleet of the support that the camera footage provides in events of false insurance claims and 50-50 accidents, the drivers build trust in the value that the system offers them. Case study example A pedestrian trips into the road, and the driver slams on their brakes to prevent a collision. When this incident is reviewed by telematics data alone, it flags as harsh braking, and the driver would have no proof that they were practising defensive driving to mitigate a potentially fatal accident. When accompanied by dash camera footage of the incident, the driver’s innocence can immediately be shown.
Road-facing cameras that utilise road driver monitoring systems, such as lane keeping, to detect driver distractions will also provide the drivers with valuable real-time safety coaching. This helps them self-correct risky behaviours and take ownership of improving their driving style to make themselves and other road users safer.
Last mile dash cam | 13
Powered by FlippingBook