European Urban Freight Efficiency Index - English

Executive Summary

Foreword

Introduction

Rankings

Two Pillars

Safety

Fleet Management

City Snapshots

What This Means

Outlook

Methodology

Executive summary

Geotab analysed a full year of connected vehicle data across seven major European capitals to benchmark urban freight efficiency at scale. Cities were scored on two dimensions: how well traffic flows through the network and the operational waste (in fuel, emissions and time) that congestion creates. Berlin and Amsterdam form a clear efficiency tier, with strong performance across both dimensions. Dublin and Rome occupy the middle ground, each with distinct strengths. Paris, London and Madrid face the greatest challenges — but for very different reasons. Congestion management is the biggest differentiator between cities — not vehicle behaviour. And across the study, truck fleets consistently outperform passenger vehicle fleets — not because of different technology, but because of operational discipline: structured routing, scheduled delivery windows and freight-specific infrastructure. Combined, the study fleet burned over 1.5 million litres of fuel while stationary in 2025 — estimated cost of idle fuel waste across connected vehicles in the study, in 2025.

Overall ranking

144% 5 of 7 The efficiency gap between the best and worst performing cities.

Cities where truck fleets outperform passenger vehicle fleets.

Rank City

Overall Score (0-100)

1 Berlin

61

2 Amsterdam

59

3 Dublin

49

4 Rome

48

39% €2.6m Collective improvement possible if all cities matched Berlin’s efficiency.

5 Paris

37

Estimated cost of idle fuel waste across connected vehicles in the study, in 2025.

6 London

29

7 Madrid

25

European Urban Freight Efficiency Index

3

Powered by